From the Times Online:
Cherie Blair is to be investigated by the organisation that deals with complaints against judges after she gave a more lenient sentence to a Muslim offender because he was “religious”.
The Judicial Complaints Office is to look into a complaint by the National Secular Society that Mrs Blair, who practises law under her maiden name of Booth, suspended a six-month jail sentence passed on Shamso Miah on the ground that he was devout.
In a nutshell Shamso
- lied to the court claiming he was acting in self defense (cctv footage showed otherwise)
- Shamso punched one Mohammed Furcan in the face
- then when the victim followed him, he knocked him to the ground fracturing his jaw
The man’s religion should have nothing to do with it.
Or perhaps their might be a passage in the Koran where if you do wrong you cop the consequences?
Does Cherie’s line of reasoning hold true for paedophile priests I wonder?
Related posts:
- On a lighter note Last night I got to meet up with Thumper and...
- Where are the responsible Muslim leaders… are they not being givena voice, or are they not...
- Doesn’t Atheism require as much faith as belief in god? Donna, has pondered: “I wondered to myself this weekend if,...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/pm/2010/02/are_religio...