<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sir Humphrey would be proud&#8230;Victorian decision not to fund Atheists reads like the script of Yes Minister</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/</link>
	<description>Advocate for Science, Reason and Atheism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Parliament of World Religions &#8211; Attendance underwhelming : Sean the Blogonaut</title>
		<link>http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-24551</link>
		<dc:creator>Parliament of World Religions &#8211; Attendance underwhelming : Sean the Blogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/#comment-24551</guid>
		<description>[...] been revised to 8000) attendees by organisers, the Victorian premier was more circumspect with his estimate of 5000 but it seems that the actual numbers of people attending the event were closer to the 4000 mark. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been revised to 8000) attendees by organisers, the Victorian premier was more circumspect with his estimate of 5000 but it seems that the actual numbers of people attending the event were closer to the 4000 mark. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeandBlogonaut</title>
		<link>http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-24530</link>
		<dc:creator>SeandBlogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/#comment-24530</guid>
		<description>Is there anything in recent television history that compares? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there anything in recent television history that compares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeandBlogonaut</title>
		<link>http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-24529</link>
		<dc:creator>SeandBlogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/#comment-24529</guid>
		<description>Yeah don&#039;t get how they would make their money back 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah don&#039;t get how they would make their money back</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eccles</title>
		<link>http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-24528</link>
		<dc:creator>eccles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/#comment-24528</guid>
		<description>Do I LOVE &quot;Yes Minister&quot;. One of the writers was a Cabinet Minister. That&#039;s why it is so true. When Hacker was PM and had to appoint a Bishop, Sir Humphrey siai some of the Church of England clergy did not believe in God. Hacker was shocked. Sir Humphrey said&quot; Well Prime minister, in the Church of England belief in God is an optional extra&quot;.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do I LOVE &quot;Yes Minister&quot;. One of the writers was a Cabinet Minister. That&#039;s why it is so true. When Hacker was PM and had to appoint a Bishop, Sir Humphrey siai some of the Church of England clergy did not believe in God. Hacker was shocked. Sir Humphrey said&quot; Well Prime minister, in the Church of England belief in God is an optional extra&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Morales</title>
		<link>http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/comment-page-1/#comment-24522</link>
		<dc:creator>John Morales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seantheblogonaut.com/2009/11/sir-humphrey-would-be-proudvictorian-decision-not-to-fund-atheists-reads-like-the-script-of-yes-minister/#comment-24522</guid>
		<description>Sigh.

... and Tiger Woods was paid &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/26/2526532.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;$3M&lt;/a&gt; just to play.

Priorities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.</p>
<p>&#8230; and Tiger Woods was paid <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/26/2526532.htm" rel="nofollow">$3M</a> just to play.</p>
<p>Priorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.916 seconds -->
