No Gambling on Christian Holy Days

This morning on Nine’s Today show, I caught a short discussion on the decision to allow NSW TAB to operate on Good Friday.  Karl Stefanovic, a catholic, said he didn’t care that it didn’t concern him as he would be doing his own thing on the day.  The guest commenter, editor of Woman’s Day/ Woman’s Weekly( can’t remember) said something to the effect that Australia was traditionally a christian nation and that Good Friday should be day of rest ( one wonders if this includes her staff).

The religious (meaning of course the Christian religious as there are no other religions of importance in Australia) are up in arms:

 

Religious groups are furious Tabcorp has decided to open for gambling on Good Friday for the first time.

The decision to allow punters to place bets at agencies and hotels comes as New South Wales authorities consider an application by big retailers to open on Easter Sunday.[source]

 

Religious groups, notably the Catholic Church and the Salvation army argue  that money is the only thing sacred to gambling institutions and that religious (read Christian) holidays should be protected.

I do have to replace my irony meter every time the Catholic church talks about profit, greed etc from its mighty cathedrals with gold and fine linen adorning the alter.

We have this from Gerard Burn, Salvation Army:

“These things ought to be kept sacrosanct within our community,” he said. “Once we begin to water down these days that are significant days on the Christian calendar, then we start to see gambling becomes, in a sense, the new religion.”[source]

Is that the real issue competition, revenue draining or otherwise?  Both religion and the gambling institutions screw you, it’s just whether its a quickie or a long hard…you get the picture.

The truth of the matter is that preventing gambling on either of these days does absolutely nothing for problem gamblers.  

Nothing,  but it does help to  maintain Christian religious privilage.

 The real problem is problem gambling, but tackling that issue means looking at poker machines and looking at the cut that governments take from their operation…

A novel solution.  Reduce the number of poker machines and tax churches? No?  Come to think of it at least there is a small chance of getting something when you gamble as opposed to that promise of eternal life that dangles out of reach –  talk about bait advertising.

The fact of the matter  is that the public largely  does not care for religious authority anymore (well some people – SA still pays lip service).  The churches are losing control.  

On another persoanl note, when visiting with my mother at the local church she grew up attending it was common knowledge that the 9am service was the quick one as the priest often finished early so that he could make it to the track.  Additionally my great uncles, both Catholic priests were renown for getting the “early mail” and knowing the form guide back to front.  From all accounts they suplemented their income quite well.

And before the comment is made I’d gladly give up all religious holidays if it meant the church butting out of politics, peoples personal lives.

Until such time I’ll take the day off :)

PS 

I used to work for one Australia’s largest online gambling companies, specifically training people in regards to our requirements under Responsible Gaming Legislation, and in helping phone operators determine/identify clients with potential gambling problems

We also used to have Christmas and Good Friday Off, I loved it.  It meant that you had two guaranteed days off a year :)

Related posts:

  1. Practicing Christian…wtf? We received an application today and on this person’s resume,...
  2. Christian Privilege in Australia, as demonstrated by our Prime Minister When a wacky fundamentalist Islamic Cleric Samir Abu Hamza...
  3. Christian Run business Vjack on Atheist Revolution comments on Christian Run and Advertised...

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments

  1. I enjoy working at a law firm run by semi-observant Jews in a Christian run country- we get Christian AND Jewish high holy days off.

    It rocks!

  2. vjack says:

    I love how it isn't even really about them being able to practice their religion but more about getting to force others to do so.

  3. Ben says:

    I love the Christian complaints…as if allowing non-Christians to do stuff on Good Friday will somehow force them to as well.

  4. OzAtheist says:

    it wasn't Ita on the TV was it?

    I'm kinda surprised the catholics haven't installed a few pokies in their churches yet. lol

    as an aside, there a only a very few religious charities that refuse to take donations from the profits of gambling. One I do know of is mainly driven by the head of that charity not his religious organisation (it's a personal thing with him rather than a religious thing)

  5. Double Up Sounds good to me:D

  6. the chaplain says:

    The truth of the matter is that preventing gambling on either of these days does absolutely nothing for problem gamblers.

    That's what I was going to say, but you beat me to it. What happens with problem gamblers if the games are shut down for one day? Do they spend and lose twice as much the next day, or just spread out their expenses and losses over several days? The results will be the same no matter how they do it. If the churches think people are going to attend church services because the gambling venues are closed, they're either dreaming or smoking some good shit.

  7. I was thinking that, considering the number of clergy that have a flutter maybe they are just jealous that everyone else can pop down the betting shop while they have to go through the motions:D

  8. Rakeback says:

    I think this is really a great move.I think more like these is to be needed to prevent gambling.

    • The move was actually to allow gambling at a day/time it was once restricted, not to restrict it at a day/time it was once allowed.

      I am very anti gambling myself, but there is such a thing as doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. In this case the reasons for wanting the ban upheld are completely wrong and in my humble opinion they're actually worse than the alternative (leaving the ban in place).

Speak Your Mind