So Nancy travelled to Australia recently, unlike the Pope it seems she may have met with quite a few of the survivors of Mercy’s abuse in order to see for herself what the naughty little Australian branch seems to have been doing.
So the question is where is that public apology? You know, where you actually admit that Peter Irvine lied to the Australian public.
Or was this the sort of apology you offer to shut up potential litigants -hmmm?
At least we know that this sort of thing doesn’t happen in the States…
oh but wait..
it does..
Vickie Lucas American survivor courtesy of Cameron Reilly.
Related posts:
- Nancy labels Mercy Ministries cleanout as pruning After the Mercy Ministries scandal broke in Australia in...
- Mercy Ministries and Demonic Opression For new readers skeptical about Nancy Alcorn’s belief in Demonic...
- Cynic Sage returns and asks a question of Mercy Ministries For new readers Cynic is old Mercy Survivors Supporter. Mercy...
Loading ...
She can’t make a public apology before litigation because that would be acknowledging that they had done something wrong in the first place.
Nancy’s plan:
Come to Australia to speak with victims, charm them and prevent the from persuing any legal recourse.
From what I hear she is very adept at turing it on – mind you she has been at it for years.
In the end though it would be infinitely better for her and Mercy to admit the truth and fix the problem.
The trouble is that Nancy does not see the problem with using deliverance ministry and she can cut loose those women that fail, rationalising that they simply didn’t pray or try hard enough.
I just uploaded the interview to youtube. That oughtta get the word out.